ARTICLE FOR 2005 FALL ISSUE

San Diego Conference on Cesarean and VBAC – A Summary

By: Claudia E. Villeneuve

Cesarean avoidance and the promotion of VBAC, vaginal birth after cesarean, are extremely important topics to any pregnant mother, especially around the issue of maternal choice . Since I find these topics fascinating imagine my surprise when I discovered there are conferences dedicated to them. The International Cesarean Awareness Network (ICAN), The California Association of Midwives and the Birth Resource Network, joined efforts for the first time to organize the “Reclaiming Our Choices in Childbirth” conference from April 29 to May 1 st , 2005 in sunny San Diego , California . One look at the list of speakers and presentation topics, and I couldn't book my flight fast enough. The next ICAN conference is in 2007. This is a summary of the lectures I attended over the three days:

“Transforming Birth: Becoming a Mother-Friendly Hospital ”, Tanja Johnson

Staff at a hospital in Three Rivers , Oregon , worked very hard to re-accept VBAC patients after the Administration had decided to ban it for medical, economic and legal reasons. This presentation will be useful for birth advocates in the Edmonton area to convince Capital Health to re-consider the October 2003 ban at the Stony Plain hospital (Shared Care Program at the Westview Health Centre) and re-accept VBAC.

“Vaginal Birth After Multiple Cesareans: Keeping the Dream Alive”, Pamela Vireday

Slide after slide of statistics, medical research references, and personal stories of why women with multiple cesareans can still dream of having a vaginal birth and have an almost 75% achievement rate. Interestingly enough, there were studies where women with multiple cesareans had lower uterine rupture rates during labour than women with only one cesarean, with the (ab)use of induction drugs being the main difference. If a mom in Edmonton could have 3 perfectly safe vaginal births after 5 cesareans (a 3VBA5C mom), all at home, what is stopping the rest of us? In Netherlands , vaginal birth after cesarean is so normal that they do not even have a word for it. The term VBAC to them is as meaningless as if we said VBAT, vaginal birth after tonsillectomy. I wish we were all just birthing moms.

“The Safety of Vaginal Birth”, Mary Sagady

The relative safety of elective cesarean surgery is always a common topic. How come we never hear about the safety of elective vaginal birth? This speaker postulated that if we promoted elective vaginal birth, in the same elective cesareans are promoted, first-time mothers who are undecided would flock to caregivers that would help them have a vaginal birth in order to ensure: the releasing of ALL of the hormones the baby needs to live outside the womb, the massaging of the baby's organs during the passage through the slippery vagina, the leaving of the mother's womb/bladder/abdomen intact and healthy after birth, and the side benefits of getting ALL the maternal hormones that aid breastfeeding, aid bonding and reduce postpartum depression. I'm sold!

“The Illusion of Choice in Childbirth”, Henci Goer

This is the author of my favourite book “Obstetrical Myths Versus Research Realities: A Guide to the Medical Literature” which proves with loads of medical research why we need to avoid as many routine obstetrical interventions as possible. Ms. Goer helped write the 2004 “What Every Woman Needs to Know About Cesarean Section” booklet available for free at www.maternitywise.org . She explained that if your hospital or caregiver prohibits VBAC, waterbirth, anyone labouring for longer than 24 hours, being overdue longer than 7 days, birth without episiotomy, the use of doulas, or the practice of midwives, then you don't have those choices. Forced cesareans because of hospital and caregiver restrictions happen everyday, but medical files or statistics do not reflect that. Many women discover after ordering a copy of their hospital records, that their mandatory cesarean was labeled as patient-elected cesarean. These mistakes legally shift the responsibility for the birth on the mother, not the doctor.

“The Pain of the Witness”, Jamie Stouffer

Everyone knows the negative emotional effects that “bad” births can have on the mother. What about the effect on the witnesses to the birth? Fathers and doulas also need to process the birth and find support. Writing the birth story and attending post-cesarean support meetings are an ideal place to start the healing. By the way, let's remember that the baby needs healing too. Therapy on newborns that display signs of stress can begin right away.

“Everything You Want To Know About Uterine Rupture But Were Afraid To Ask: The Latest Findings”, Nicette Jukelevics

Preventing uterine rupture is the reason why the medical (and legal) establishment encourages repeat cesareans over VBAC. Unfortunately some statistics estimate that 199 women would need to undergo risky cesareans in order to prevent only 1 uterine rupture, regardless if the rupture is small, has no symptoms, has healed, and the great majority of babies and mothers come out fine. Women with zero cesareans have a near zero uterine rupture rate, therefore it is the first cesarean which cause future ruptures, while one VBAC actually strengthens the womb reducing its future exposure to ruptures. Preventing cesareans should be the ideal goal.

“The Passion of Birth”, Barbara Harper

This is the author of my other favourite book “Gentle Birth Choices: A Guide to Making Informed Decisions about Birthing Centers, Birth Attendants, Water Birth, Home Birth, and Hospital Birth”. She had slide after slide of families having water births in pools, rivers, lakes and oceans; and of dads catching their own babies, moms relaxing in the water with their newborns, with the siblings calmly watching. She asked that we send a message:

To all birth advocates: stop eating sugar and start walking everyday because you cannot get diabetes or heart disease and die early. You need to live a long time to continue telling women how beautiful and powerful birth can be.
 

When conference attendees from the U.S. discovered that I was from Canada , they told me how much they admired us for having lower cesarean rates and VBAC guidelines that were more flexible than theirs. I quickly corrected them by saying that our medical establishment, with some minor exceptions, is trying very hard to copy the U.S. believing it has better maternity care. Going unchecked, Canada can become as restrictive on childbirth choices as the United States is, and therefore we need to become alert when any choice is modified, reduced, restricted or prohibited. High cesarean rates do not translate into best outcomes for birth. The developed countries with the best outcomes in birth, such as Netherlands , have the lowest cesarean rates.

 

 Return to Articles

Previous    Next

 

ICAN of Edmonton and The International Cesarean Awareness Network, Inc. ("ICAN") maintain this website as an online information and communications service. Use of this website is at your own risk. The information contained on or provided through this website is intended for general consumer understanding and education only, is not intended to be, and is not provided as a substitute for professional medical advice. Nothing contained on or provided through the website is intended to be or is to be used for medical diagnosis or treatment. The website is presented by ICAN of Edmonton for the sole purpose of disseminating general health information for public benefit. Always seek the advice of your midwife, physician, nurse or other qualified health care provider before you undergo any treatment or for answers to any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. The website and any information provided on the website are not intended to constitute the practice of or furnishing of medical, nursing, or professional health care advice, diagnosis, consultation or treatment or services in any jurisdiction.

Except for information, products, services or merchandise clearly identified as being supplied by ICAN of Edmonton, ICAN of Edmonton does not operate, control, supply, endorse, warrant or guarantee any information, products, services or merchandise available on the website or through the Internet generally in any way. You understand and agree that ICAN of Edmonton does not make any express or implied warranties, representations or endorsements of any kind whatsoever (including without limitation, warranties of title or noninfringement, or any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose) with regard to the website, or with respect to any information, products, services, merchandise or other material provided on or through the website. ICAN of Edmonton does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness, or usefulness of any information, products, services, merchandise or other material provided through the website. ICAN of Edmonton makes no warranty or guarantee that the website will be uninterrupted, timely, secure, or error free.

In no event will ICAN of Edmonton or ICAN, Inc. be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken by you or anyone else in reliance upon the information contained on or provided through the website.